Skip to main content

MUSC 385: Research, Issues, and Methodologies in Musicology

Bibliographic Citation

A bibliography avoids plagiarism and gives credibility to research.  Pay attention to details when creating citations.  Strive for consistency and accurate information, so interested readers can follow up on citations for reading or further research.

Writing Style Guides for Music

Style Guide

Chicago manual of style is the preferred style of documentation for MUSC385.  Use the online version, or the print version of the 16th ed. in the library. Chicago name-date style examples below:

Chapter in an edited book:

Baily, John. 1994. "The role of music in the creation of an Afghan national identity." In Ethnicity, identity and music: the musical construction of place, ed. Martin Stokes, 45-60. Providence, RI: Berg Publishers.

Journal article:

Sparling, Heather. 2008. "Categorically speaking: towards a theory of (musical) genre in Cape Breton Gaelic culture." Ethnomusicology 52(3): 401-25.

See others under Citing your sources.

Citing Your Sources

Chicago manual of style, 16th ed. is the preferred style of documentation for MUSC385.

Check out these sites for other information on citing sources:

Queen's Library guide: Citing sources

Queen's Library guide: Citing and Citation Managers

Western Libraries, London, ON: Citing MUSIC SOURCES (2010) - in PDF format

Writing Style Guides for Music

Cowdery, James R., ed. How to write about music: the RILM manual of style, 2nd ed. New York: Répertoire International de Littérature Musicale, 2006. Ref. ML3797 .H69 2006

Gottlieb, Jane. Music library and research skills. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009. Ref. ML3797 .G68 2009

Holoman, D. Kern. Writing about music: a style sheet, 3rd ed. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2014. Ref. ML3797 .W75 2014

Sampsell, Laurie J. Music research: a handbook. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. Ref. ML113 .S28 2009

Wingell, Richard J., and Silvia Herzog. Introduction to research in music. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001. Ref. ML113 .W564 2001t

Wingell, Richard J. Writing about music: an introductory guide, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Pearson Hall, 2009. Ref. ML3797 .W54 2009

Evaluating Sources

Evaluating your sources is a crucial step of the research process. You need to evaluate carefully each source to determine its appropriateness and quality.

Check our Evaluating Sources Checklist for criteria used to judge information sources and our Scholarly and Popular Resources page to distinguish between scholarly and popular publications.

It is particularly important to evaluation information that you find on the Web. Because there are no rules and anyone can post a page on the Web, you will have to determine whether the web site is of value. Go to Evaluating Web Sources (CRAAP Test) for specific criteria used to analyze websites.

Check our Distinguishing Scholarly Journals from Other Periodicals page in order to evaluate periodicals by looking at their content, purpose, and intended audience.

Writing Centre

Writing Centre

The Queen's Writing Centre provides help with brainstorming ideas, creating outlines, improving grammar and style, and thesis statements.  Students are advised to book an appointment for one-on-one consultations. The Centre is located in the Stauffer Library as part of Queen's Student Academic Success Services (SASS), which also comprises Learning Strategies.

See the SASS links for Learning Topics and Writing Topics and Writing Handouts/Tip Sheets, including Writing Critical Book Reviews.

Reflective Writing

Reflection means taking some time to examine your thoughts, beliefs, values, attitudes and assumptions about your understanding of a topic, a situation or problem.  The key questions in reflective thinking are how? and why? rather than just what?  In reflective writing, students are asked to write down their personal thoughts.  

Reflective Writing (University of Leeds)

Reflective Writing (Royal Roads University)