Expert Evidence, 4th Edition
by
Glenn R. Anderson
"Expert evidence creates numerous problems for lawyers and judges. The Supreme Court of Canada has recognized such dangers, including misleading and confusing expert evidence, expert evidence that distorts the fact-finding process, and lawyers' difficulty challenging expert evidence. In this new, fully updated edition, Glenn Anderson eases the strain of managing expert evidence through his detailed analysis of the law across all provinces in Canada, from both civil and criminal law perspectives. He also discusses potential reforms to improve the impartiality of expert witnesses and the reliability of expert evidence and its evaluation."
Frustration of contract
by
MacDougall, Bruce MacDougall, Bruce
Includes table of cases and table of statutes.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
"Frustration is perhaps the strongest legal intervention in a contract bringing it to a termination when an unexpected catastrophe makes the contract radically different from that to which the parties agreed. This book is a comprehensive treatment of the law of frustration in Canada and is the first book on that subject. The book examines what circumstances lead to frustration (and which do not) and it discusses the consequences of frustration. The book also examines the use of force majeure clauses that obviate the need for the doctrine of frustration."-
Fundamental principles of Canadian unjust enrichment
by
Mitchell McInnes
"This book provides a concise introduction to the Canadian law of unjust enrichment, filling a gap in the market for a practical overview of restitutionary liability. It covers the basic principles, juristic reasons for reversing enrichments, defences, and restitution, highlighting unique aspects of Canadian law like remedial constructive trusts and the civilian-inspired test of injustice. The book takes a practical approach, citing recent cases and using diagrams to illustrate key concepts. A clear and accessible guide to Canadian unjust enrichment law, ideal for judges, lawyers, and students seeking a practical understanding of restitutionary liability
The principle of legality : a moral theory
by
Conor Crummey
The Principle of Legality' reopens the question of what happens when statutory interpretation overrides common law rights and principles. Drawing on the philosophy of language and general jurisprudence, it demonstrates that judges, when invoking the 'principle of legality', are in fact engaging in profound moral reasoning.