Skip to Main Content
QUL logo

How to Avoid Predatory Publishers and Conferences

Help & Guidance

For additional help and guidance:

Verify the Credibility of a Journal or Publisher

Identify Reputable Journals

Think, Check, Submit

Further Reading

Here is a sample of useful readings on the issue of predatory and / or deceptive publishers:

Al-Khatib, A. (2016). Protecting authors from predatory journals and publishersPublishing Research Quarterly32(4), 281-285.

Berger, M., & Cirasella, J. (2015). Beyond Beall’s list: better understanding predatory publishers. College & research libraries news, 76(3), 132-135.

Clark, J., & Smith, R. (2015). Firm action needed on predatory journalsBMJ350(jan16_1), h210.

Kozak, M., Iefremova, O., & Hartley, J. (2016). Spamming in scholarly publishing: a case studyJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology67(8), 2009-2015.

Loscalzo, J. (2016). The Future of Medical Journal PublishingCirculation133(16), 1621-1624.

Shen, C., & Björk, B. C. (2015). ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristicsBMC medicine13(1), 230.

Conservation Tools

A comprehensive database of 100,000 abstracts of literature related to the preservation and conservation of material cultural heritage. (formerly Art and Archaeology Technical Abstracts).
 
Nearly 200,000 citations to technical reports, conference proceedings, journal articles, books and audiovisual and unpublished materials. Database includes previously unavailable material from private sources, as well as new information gathered by a worldwide network of contributors.

Art Image Tools

Artstor (digital image library for educational and scholarly uses. To use ARTstor to its full advantage (both on or off campus), you must first become a "registered user")
 
Oxford Art Online (includes Grove Art – limit 8 users)