Skip to Main Content
QUL logo

POLS-590 / POLS-860

Evaluating Sources

Up until now, we have primarily been focusing on how to find books and journal articles through the Library's resources. In this module we will look at two very important aspects in the research process that occur after you have located a piece of information (book, journal article or website): evaluating and citing sources.

Carefully evaluate each source you find to determine if it is appropriate for your research. Previously, we discussed how academic journal articles can be distinguished from other types of periodicals. Here is a checklist for criteria used to judge information sources, particularly books.

Evaluating Sources Checklist

 Purpose Why was the resource written? Was the author's purpose to inform, persuade, or to refute a particular idea or point of view?
 Audience Is the resource intended for the general public, scholars, professionals,etc.
 Authority What are the author's qualifications? Consider author's educational background, past writings and experience. Is the author associated with an organization or institution? Who is the publisher? Are they well known? Does any group control the publishing company?
 Accuracy Is the information covered fact, opinion, or propaganda? Facts can be usually verified. Opinions evolve from the interpretation of facts. Are the author's conclusions or facts supported with references?
 Timeliness When was the information published? Is the date of publication appropriate for your topic?
 Coverage Is it relevant to your topic? Is the topic covered in depth, partially or is it an broad overview? Does the resource add new information, update other sources or substantiate other resources that you have consulted?
 Objectivity Does the author present multiple viewpoints or is it biased? How do critical reviews rate the work?