R v Carosella, [1997] 1 SCR 80, rev'g (1995), 26 OR (3d) 209 (CA), aff'g (1994), 25 CR (4th) 301 (Ct J (GD)).
This case history indicates that the Supreme Court's decision reversed the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision and affirmed the Ontario Court of Justice (General Division). In other words, the Supreme Court disagreed with the Court of Appeal but agreed with the trial court.
R v Carosella (1994), 25 CR (4th) 301 (Ct J (GD)), rev'd (1995), 26 OR (3d) 209 (CA), aff'd [1997] 1 SCR 80.
When ordered this way, the case history indicates that the Ontario Court of Justice (General Division) was reversed by the Ontario Court of Appeal but affirmed by the Supreme Court. In other words, the Court of Appeal disagreed with the trial court, but the Supreme Court agreed with the trial court.