A completed Work Plan for systematic and/or scoping reviews is required for librarian consultations. Please see the Tasks to Complete Before Meeting with a Librarian for a full list of prerequisites.
The purpose of this guide is to connect you with useful information and resources for embarking on a systematic review or other type of synthesis. Librarian involvement in systematic reviews is a practice recommendation by the Institute of Medicine and leading sources of evidence-based information including Cochrane and JBI [1-3]. Research has shown that librarian involvement in systematic reviews increases the quality of search strategies and reporting [4-7]. Please not there is a separate research guide for conducting traditional literature reviews. |
For students to meet with a librarian, you must provide the following materials at least 24 hours or 1 business day in advance:
Complete and return the Knowledge Synthesis Work Plan document or share your protocol (a draft is acceptable but the research question and eligibility criteria must be finalized).
Your Work Plan should include a preliminary search strategy in Ovid MEDLINE or Ovid Embase (PubMed will not be accepted), and 3-5 key studies that meet your eligibility criteria.
Complete the Synthesis Labyrinth: Racing the Outbreak escape room or the basic Syntheses Knowledge Check version and include the code in your Work Plan. (This only needs to be completed one-time.)
Be sure to review this guide and the training modules (particularly, Module 3: Searching for Eligible Studies) and check out our new Systematic and Scoping Reviews Workshop Series for interactive learning!
Librarians provide advisory consultations to all Queen’s University faculty, staff, and students conducting syntheses.
To meet with a librarian about support for your knowledge synthesis, please book a consultation using our online booking system.
Important notes:
Librarians will advise on how to:
Collaboration with review teams that include faculty members is provided at the discretion of the librarian based on their availability and the review quality considerations in the table below. Librarians follow ICMJE author guidelines where collaboration shall include authorship.
To meet with a librarian about support for your knowledge synthesis, please book a consultation using our online booking system.
As a co-author, a librarian may agree to do the following:
Review characteristics for librarian collaboration consideration:
Is the review being conducted under the auspices of a systematic review collaboration (i.e. Cochrane, JBI, Campbell)? |
Has the same review already been published recently? |
Can the researcher(s) clearly describe the research question? |
Has the researcher(s) established inclusion and exclusion criteria? |
Does the research question seem manageable in scope (not likely to yield too many eligible studies)? |
Does the research question seem worthwhile (not likely to yield no or too few eligible studies)? |
Does the review type match the research purpose? |
Can the researcher(s) clearly describe the rationale and planned methods of the review? |
Has a protocol been prepared? Will it be registered (e.g. PROSPERO) or published? |
Does the review team plan to follow best practice standards for conducting and reporting reviews such as PRISMA? |
Does the review team agree to a comprehensive search approach (i.e. searching all key databases, employing comprehensive search strategies etc.)? |
Will the screening process involve the decision of two screeners for each item reviewed (at the citation/abstract level and full-text level)? |
Does the research project seem manageable for the number of review team members? |
Are the review timelines realistic and feasible? |
Systematic and scoping reviews are a type of literature review with a transparent, rigorous and reproducible methodology. Synthesis research intended for publication will benefit from having a full team of experts including but not limited to methodologists, subject experts, librarians, and statisticians and take an average of 1.25 years to complete [9].
As such, there are exercises that can be incorporated into assignments to better equip students to undertake evidence syntheses in their future studies/work without the time and resource constraints of a full review. Please contact a librarian for assistance in drafting evidence synthesis assignments.